RESEARCH METHODOLOGY OF SUS SCROFA TISSUE EXTRACTS PROTEIN-PEPTIDE COMPONENTS


https://doi.org/10.21323/2414-438X-2017-2-3-79-85

Full Text:


Abstract

The article presents a comparative analysis of four methods for quantifying the protein-peptide complexes content in extracts obtained from animal raw materials, as well as the low- and highmolecular weight extract fractions: the direct spectrophotometric determination at wavelengths of 260 and 280 nm with subsequent calculation by the Kalckar formula; the biuret reaction by the Kingsley-Weichselbaum method; the method with Bradford reagent and the standard Lowry method. Experimental data analysis demonstrates that in case of the extract that contains protein-peptidic complexes in different molecular weights range, the Kingsley-Weichselbaum method shows the highest quality of protein concentration determination; while studying highmolecular weight fraction (more than 30 kDa), it is possible to obtain more information by combining the spectrophotometric method and the Kingsley-Weichselbaum method. Low-molecular weight fractions (less than 30 kD) should be investigated by complex methods including the spectrophotometric method, Lowry and Bradford methods. These methods make it possible to presumably estimate protein molecules size ranges (by amount of peptide bonds), and also to determine hydrophobic and aromatic amino acids presence.

About the Authors

Ekaterina R.. Vasilevskaya
V.M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems of Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
junior researcher of Experimental clinic–research laboratory of biologically active substances of an animal origin, V.M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems of Russian Academy of Sciences 109316, Moscow, Talalikhina str., 26 Tel.: +7–495–676–92–11


Elena A. Kotenkova
V.M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems of Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
candidate of technical sciences, research scientist of Experimental clinic –research laboratory of biologically active substances of an animal origin, V.M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems of Russian Academy of Sciences 109316, Moscow, Talalikhina str., 26 Tel.: +7–495–676–92–11


Ekaterina A. Lukinova
V.M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems of Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
senior laboratory assistant of Experimental clinic –research laboratory of biologically active substances of an animal origin, V.M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems of Russian Academy of Sciences 109316, Moscow, Talalikhina str., 26 Tel.: +7–495–676–92–11


Evgenia A. Kalinova
V.M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems of Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
senior laboratory assistant of Experimental clinic –research laboratory of biologically active substances of an animal origin, V.M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems of Russian Academy of Sciences 109316, Moscow, Talalikhina str., 26 Tel.: +7–495–676–92–11


References

1. Noble, J.E. Quantitation of protein/ J. E. Noble, M.J. Bailey// Methods Enzymol.— 2009. — V.463. — P. 73–95. DOI: 10.1016/S0076–6879(09)63008–1

2. Brady, P.N. Evaluation of Colorimetric Assays for Analyzing Reductively Methylated Proteins: Biases and Mechanistic Insights/P.N. Brady, M.A.Macnaughtan //Analytical biochemistry.—2015. — V.491. — P. 43–51. DOI:10.1016/j.ab.2015.08.027

3. Lanouette, S. The functional diversity of protein lysine methylation/S. Lanouette, V. Mongeon, D. Figeys, J.F. Couture //MolSyst Biol. — 2014. — V. 10. — P. 1–26.

4. Gordon, M.A.R. A comparison of two colorimetric assays, based upon Lowry and Bradford techniques, to estimate total protein in soil extracts / M.A.R. Gordon, E. Armenise, R.P. White, P.R. Hirsch, K.W.T. Goulding // Soil BiolBiochem.— 2013. — V.67(100). — P. 166–173.

5. Olson, B. Assays for determination of protein concentration/ B. Olson, J. Markwell // CurrProtoc Protein Sci.— 2007. — Unit 3.4.

6. Jian, W. A workflow for absolute quantitation of large therapeutic proteins in biological samples at intact level using LCHRMS/W. Jian, L. Kang, L. Burton, N. Weng // Bioanalysis.— 2016. — V. 8. P. 1679–91.

7. Larda, S.T. Lysine methylation strategies for characterizing protein conformations by NMR/ S.T. Larda, M.P. Bokoch, F. Evanics, R.S. Prosser//J Biomol NMR.— 2012. — V. 54. — P. 199–209.

8. Georgiou, C.D. Mechanism of Coomassie brilliant blue G‑250 binding to proteins: A hydrophobic assay for nanogram quantities of proteins/ C.D. Georgiou, K. Grintzalis, G. Zervoudakis, I. Papapostolou // Anal Bioanal Chem.— 2008. — V. 391. — P. 391–403.

9. Whiffen, L.K. Polyphenolic compounds interfere with quantification of protein in soil extracts using the Bradford method/L.K. Whiffen, D.J. Midgley, P.A. McGee //Soil BiolBiochem.— 2007. — V. 39(2). — P. 691–694.

10. Vavilova, T.P. Comparative analysis of protein content in the bone tissue of the upper and lower jaw / T.P.Vavilova, V.A. Kitaev, A.V.Pushkina, S.V.Shishkin // Vyatsky medical bulletin.— 2007.— № 4.

11. Roberson, K.J. Review of methods to assign the nuclear magnetic resonance peaks of reductively methylated proteins/K.J. Roberson, M.A.Macnaughtan // Anal Biochem.— 2014. — V. 466. — P. 76–82.

12. Fedulova L.V. Influence of Different Polypeptides Fractions Derived from Sus Scrofa Immune Organs on the Rats Immunological Reactivity/ L.V. Fedulova, Е.R. Vasilevskaya,, Е.А. Kotenkova, A.A. Elkina, M.G. Baryshev, A.B. Lisitsyn //Journal of Pharmacy and Nutrition Sciences.— 2017.— № 7. — Р. 35–40

13. Krohn, R.I. The Colorimetric Detection and Quantitation of Total Protein // Current Protocols in Cell Biology.— 2002. — V. 15. — P. 3H: A.3H.1–A.3H.28. DOI: 10.1002/0471143030.cba03hs15

14. Reichelt, W. Bioprocess monitoring: minimizing sample matrix effects for total protein quantification with bicinchoninic acid assay/ W. Reichelt, D. Waldschitz, C. Herwig, L. Neutsch// J IndMicrobiolBiotechnol.— 2016. — V. 43. — P. 1271–80.

15. Ku, H.K. Interpretation of protein quantitation using the Bradford assay: comparison with two calculation model/ H.K. Ku, H.M. Lim, K.H. Oh, H.J. Yang, J.S. Jeong, S.K. Kim// Anal Biochem.— 2013. — V. 434(1). — P. 178–180.

16. Vasilevskaya E.R. The effect of the isotopic composition of water on the extraction of bioactive compounds / E.R. Vasilevskaya, L.V. Fedulova, E.A. Kotenkova, A.P. Danshin //Vse o myase.— 2016. — No. 6. — P. 42–45.

17. Simonian, M.H. Quantitation of proteins/ M.H. Simonian, J.A. Smyth// Protocols in Molecular Biology, supplement 76.—2006. — P. 10.1A1–10.1A9.

18. Janairo, G. Determination of the Sensitivity Range of Biuret Test for Undergraduate Biochemistry Experiments/ G. Janairo, M. L. Sy, L. Yap, N. Llanos-Lazaro, J. Robles //Journal of Science & Technology.— 2011. — V. 5(6). — P. 77–83.

19. Lu, T. S. Interpretation of biological and mechanical variations between the Lowry versus Bradford method for protein quantification/ T. S. Lu, B. S. Yiao, M. D. Kenneth, R. V. Jensen, L. Hsiao //North American Journal of Medical Sciences.—2010. — V. 2(7). — P. 325–328.

20. Waterborg, J. H. The Lowry Method for Protein Quantitation//The Protein Protocols Handbook.— 2009. — V. 32. — P. 7–10.

21. Okutucu, B. Comparison of five methods for determination of total plasma protein concentration/ B. Okutucu, A. Dınçer, Ö. Habib, F. Zıhnıoglu // Journal of Biochemical and Biophysical Methods.— 2007. — V. 70(5). — P. 709–711.


Supplementary files

For citation: Vasilevskaya E.R., Kotenkova E.A., Lukinova E.A., Kalinova E.A. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY OF SUS SCROFA TISSUE EXTRACTS PROTEIN-PEPTIDE COMPONENTS. Theory and practice of meat processing. 2017;2(3):79-85. https://doi.org/10.21323/2414-438X-2017-2-3-79-85

Views: 558

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2414-438X (Print)
ISSN 2414-441X (Online)