METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF IDENTIFICATION OF TISSUE-SPECIFIC PROTEINS AND PEPTIDES FORMING THE CORRECTIVE PROPERTIES OF INNOVATIVE MEAT PRODUCTS

One of the ways to address the food quality issues facing the industry is the development of standardized and certified methods related to the conduct of in-depth studies of biochemical indicators of quality and safety of meat and meat products. The world laboratory practice in the field of food quality and safety shows a constant expansion of the list of controlled indicators of food raw materials and products. An important feature of the modern period in the development of biomedical and biotechnological research is the introduction of a whole complex of postgenomic technologies, which are based on a systematic approach to the study of the functioning of the mammalian proteome in various physiological and pathological conditions, including the formation and development of alimentary-dependent pathologies. In this regard, the problem of multilateral study of food products, in particular their identification, is the most relevant, because the modern technology of their production has undergone significant changes and requires the development of “gentle “ processing modes. They concern raw materials and auxiliary materials used at all stages of production. This and new technologies of production of protein products from plant raw materials, as well as the introduction of food raw materials and food additives of artificial origin and the excess introduction of additives of plant and animal origin can cause falsification of products, as well as affect the health of the consumer. Food quality assessment includes the control of components of finished products. It is most difficult to determine the proportion of muscle protein in multi-component meat products that have undergone heat treatment. Therefore, in practice, when assessing the quality of food products, there is a need to identify its real composition in accordance with the declared normative documents. Currently, a promising area of research in the field of determining the composition of finished food is the selection of biomarkers of various components. Therefore, it is important to develop a methodology for the identification of biochemical changes in food raw materials under the influence of technological factors using modern research methods. This paper provides an overview of the protein and peptide analysis methodology, including the latest technologies that are becoming increasingly important.

1. Alberts, B., Johnson, A., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts K., Walter P. (2007). Molecular Biology of the Cell. Garland Science, 318.

2. Kent, S.B. (2009). Total chemical synthesis of proteins. Chemical Society Reviews, 38(2), 338–51.

3. Pickel, B., Schaller, A. (2013). Dirigent proteins: molecular characteristics and potential biotechnological applications. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 97(19), 8427–8438.

4. Protein (2018). [Electronic resource: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protein Date of circulation 01.05.2018]

5. Wickner, S. (1999). Posttranslational quality control: folding, refolding and degrading proteins. Science, 286, 1888–1893.

6. Marri, R., Grenner, D., Meyyes, P., Roduell, W. (1993). Human Biochemistry: In 2 volumes. T. 2. (Translated from English by V.V. Borisova and Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences E.V. Dainichenko, edited by L.M. Ginodman, Doctor of Chemical Sciences). M: World. — 415 p. ISBN: 5–03–001774–7. (In Russian)

7. Emig, D., Albrecht, M. (2011). Tissue-specific proteins and functional implications. Journal of Proteome Research, 10(4), 1893–1903.

8. Chen, G., Wang. J. (2012). Identifying functional modules in tissue specific protein interaction network. Proceedings IEEE In-ternational Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine Workshops,BIBMW 6470204, 581–586.

9. Greenbaum, D., Colangelo, C., Williams, K., Gerstein, M. (2013). Comparing protein abundance and mRNA expression levels on a genomic scale. Genome Biology, 4(9), 117.

10. Picard, B., Lebret, B., Cassar‑Malek, I., Liaubet, L., Berri, C., Nihan‑Duval le, B., Hocquette, J.F., Renand, G. (2015). Recent advances in omic technologies for meat quality management. Meat Science, 109, 18–26.

11. Vostrikova, N.L., Chernukha, I.M. (2017). Bioinformatics — instrument interpretation proteomic profiles of meat protein. Theory and practice of meat processing,2(1), 4–17

12. Stepanenko, O.V., Verkhusha, V.V., Kuznetsova, I.M., Uversky, V.N., Turoverov, K.K. (2008). Fluorescent proteins as biomarkers and biosensors: throwing color lights on molecular and cellular processes. Current Protein and Peptide Science,9(4), 338–69.

13. Yuste, R (2005). Fluorescence microscopy today. Nature Methods, 2(12), 902–904.

14. Collins, N., Poot, R.A., Kukimoto, I., Garcia-Jimenez, C., Dellaire, G., Varga-Weisz, P.D. (2002). An ACF1‑ISWI chromatin-remodeling complex is required for DNA replication through heterochromatin. Nature Genetics, 32, 627–632.

15. Khwannimit, B. (2008). Serial evaluation of the MODS, SOFA and LOD scores to predict ICU mortality in mixed critically ill patients. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, 91(9), 1336–1342.

16. Walker, J.H., Wilson, K. (2000). Principles and Techniques of Practical Biochemistry. Cambridge University Press, 287–289.

17. Hohsaka, T., Sisido, M. (2002). Incorporation of non-natural amino acids into proteins. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, 6(6), 809–815.

18. Cedrone, F., Ménez, A., Quéméneur, E. (2000). Tailoring new enzyme functions by rational redesign. Current Opinion in Structural Biology,10(4), 405–410.

19. Görg, A., Weiss, W., Dunn, M.J. (2004). Current two-dimensional electrophoresis technology for proteomics. Proteomics, 4(12), 3665–3685.

20. Koegl, M., Uetz, P. (2007). Improving yeast two-hybrid screening systems. Briefings in Functional Genomics and Proteomics, 6(4), 302–312.

21. Conrotto, P., Souchelnytskyi, S. (2008). Proteomic approaches in biological and medical sciences: principles and applications. Experimental Oncology, 30(3), 171–180.

22. Zhang, C., Kim, S.H. (2003). Overview of structural genomics: from structure to function. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, 7(1), 28–32.

23. Standley, D.M., Kinjo, A.R., Kinoshita, K., Nakamura, H. (2008). Protein structure databases with new web services for structural biology and biomedical research. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 9(4), 276–285.

24. Harvey, D. (2000). Modern analytical chemistry. USA: The McGraw-Hill Companies. — 816 р.

25. Kroeff, E., Owens, R., Campbell, E., Johnson, R., Marks, H. (1989). Production scale purification of biosynthetic human insulin by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Journal of. Chromatography A,461, 45–61.

26. Seino, S., Funakoshi, А., Fu, Z., Vinik, A. (1985). Identification of insulin variants in patients with hyperinsulinemia by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Diabetes, 34(1), 1–7.

27. Grace, V. (2002). Technical Support Group. The Handbook of Analysis and Purification of Peptides and Proteins by Reversed-Phase HPLC. Third Edition, 4–5.

28. Aebersold, R., Mann, M. (2003). Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature, 422(6928), 198–207.

29. Mann, M., Hendrickson, R., Pandey, A. (2001). Analysis of proteins and proteomes by mass spectrometry. Annual Review of Biochemistry, 70, 437–473.

30. Aebersold, R., Mann, M. (2003). Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature, 422(6928), 198–207.

31. Switzar, L., Giera, M., Niessen, W. (2013). Protein digestion: an overview of the available techniques and recent developments. Journal of Proteome Research, 12(3), 1067–1077.

32. Angel, T. E., Aryal, U. K., Hengel, S. M., Baker, E. S., Kelly, R. T., Robinson, E. W., Smith, R. D. (2012). Mass spectrometry-based proteomics: existing capabilities and future directions. Chemical Society Reviews, 41(10), 3912–3928.

33. Marko-Varga, G., Fehniger, T. E. (2004). Proteomics and disease–the challenges for technology and discovery. Journal of Proteome Research, 3(2), 167–178.

34. Calligaris, D., Villard, C., Lafitte, D. (2011). Advances in top-down proteomics for disease biomarker discovery. Journal of Proteomics,74(7), 920–934.

35. Chait, B. T. Chemistry. (2006). Mass spectrometry: bottom-up or topdown. Science, 314(5796), 65–66.

36. Wu, S. — L., Hühmer, A. F. R., Hao, Z., Karger, B. L. (2007). On-line LC–MS approach combining collision-induced dissociation (CID), electron-transfer dissociation (ETD), and CID of an isolated charge-reduced species for the trace-level characterization of proteins with post-translational modifications. Journal of Proteome Research, 6(11), 4230–4244.

37. McLafferty, F. W., Breuker, K., Jin, M., Han, X., Infusini, G., Jiang, H., Kong, X., Begley, T. P. (2007). Top‑down MS, a powerful complement to the high capabilities of proteolysis proteomics. FEBS Journal, 274(24), 6256–6268.

38. Lanucara, F.; Eyers, C. E. (2013). Top‑down mass spectrometry for the analysis of combinatorial post‑translational modifications. Mass Spectrometry Reviews,32(1), 27–42.

39. Han, X., Jin, M., Breuker, K., McLafferty, F. W. (2006). Extending top-down mass spectrometry to proteins with masses great than 200 kilodaltons. Science, 314(5796), 109–112.

40. Chi, A., Bai, D. L., Geer, L. Y., Shabanowitz, J., Hunt, D. F. (2007). Analysis of intact proteins on a chromatographic time scale by electron transfer dissociation tandem mass spectrometry. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, 259(1–3), 197–203.

41. Compton, P. D., Zamdborg, L., Thomas, P. M., Kelleher, N. L. (2011). On the scalability and requirements of whole protein mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry, 83(17), 6868–6874.

42. Boyne, M. T., Garcia, B. A., Li, M., Zamdborg, L., Wenger, C. D., Babai, S., Kelleher, N. L. (2008). Tandem mass spectrometry with ultrahigh mass accuracy clarifies peptide identification by database retrieval. Journal of Proteome Research, 8(1), 374–379.

43. Cannon, J., Lohnes, K., Wynne, C., Wang, Y., Edwards, N., Fenselau, C. (2010). High-throughput middle-down analysis using an orbitrap. Journal of Proteome Research, 9(8), 3886–3890.

44. Hauser, N. J., Han, H., McLuckey, S. A., Basile, F. (2008). Electron transfer dissociation of peptides generated by microwave D-cleavage digestion of proteins. Journal of Proteome Research, 7(5), 1867–1872.

45. Kalli, A., Hakansson, K. (2010). Electron capture dissociation of highly charged proteolytic peptides from Lys N, Lys C and Glu C digestion. Molecular Biosystems, 6(9), 1668–1681.

46. Wu, S. — L., Kim, J., Hancock, W. S., Karger, B. (2005). Extended Range Proteomic Analysis (ERPA): A new and sensitive LC–MS platform for high sequence coverage of complex proteins with extensive post‑translational modifications‑comprehensive analysis of beta‑casein and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR). Journal of Proteome Research,4(4), 1155–1170.

47. Deutsch, E. W., Lam, H., Aebersold, R. (2008). Data analysis and bioinformatics tools for tandem mass spectrometry in proteomics. Physiological Genomics, 33(1), 18–25.

48. Brownridge, P., Beynon, R. J. (2011). The importance of the digest: proteolysis and absolute quantification in proteomics. Methods,54(4), 351–360.

49. Perkins, D., Pappin, D., Creasy, D., Cottrell, J. (1999). Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence data-bases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis, 20(18), 3551–3567.

50. Eng, J., McCormack, A., Yates, J. (1994). An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. Journal of The American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 5(11), 976–989.

51. Craig, R., Beavis, R. (2004). TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics,20(9), 1466–1467.

52. Tanner, S., Shu, H., Frank, A., Wang, L., Zandi, E., Mumby, M., Pevzner, P., Bafna, V. (2005). InsPecT: identification of posttrans-lationally modified peptides from tandem mass spectra. Analytical Chemistry, 77(14), 4626–4639.

53. Geer, L., Markey, S., Kowalak, J., Wagner, L., Xu, M., Maynard, D., Yang, X., Shi, W., Bryant, S. (2004). Open mass spectrometry search algorithm. Journal of Proteome Research, 3(5), 958–964.

54. Xu, H., Freitas, M. (2009). MassMatrix: a database search program for rapid characterization of proteins and peptides from tandem mass spectrometry data. Proteomics, 9(6), 1548–1555.

55. Park, C., Klammer, A., Kall, L., MacCoss, M., Noble, W. (2008). Rapid and accurate peptide identification from tandem mass spectra. Journal of Proteome Research, 7(7), 624–627.

56. Tabb, D., Fernando, C., Chambers, M. (2007). MyriMatch: highly accurate tandem mass spectral peptide identification by multivariate hypergeometric analysis. Journal of Proteome Research, 6(2), 654–661.

57. Kim, S., Mischerikow, N., Bandeira, N., Navarro, J., Wich, L., Mohammed, S., Heck, A., Pevzner, P. (2010). The generating function of CID, ETD, and CID/ETD pairs of tandem mass spectra: applications to database search. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics,9(12), 2840–2852.

58. Pappin, D., Hojrup, P., Bleasby, A. (1993). Rapid identification of proteins by peptide-mass fingerprinting. Current Biology, 3(6), 327–332.

59. Mascot software, the benchmark for identification, characterisation and quantitation of proteins using mass spectrometry data. [Electronic resource: http://www.matrixscience.com. Date of circulation 07. 07. 2018]

60. Perkins, D., Pappin, D., Creasy, D., Cottrell, J. (1999). Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence data-bases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis, 20(18), 3551–3567.

61. Avtonomov, D., Agron, I., Kononikhin, A., Nikolayev, Ye. (2009). Creation of a database of accurate mass‑time marks for a qualitative and quantitative approach in the study of a human urine proteome using isotope labeling. Proceedings of MFTI, 1(1), 24–29 p. (In Russian)

62. Scoring Schemes. [Electronic resource: https://edwardslab.bmcb.georgetown.edu/mascot/help/scoring_help.html. Date of circulation 08. 06. 2018]

63. Protein Digestion. [Electronic resource: http://proteomics-resource.washington.edu/protocols06/sequest.php. Date of circulation 13.07.2018]

64. SEQUEST correlates uninterpreted tandem mass spectra of peptides with amino acid sequences from protein and nucleotide databases. [Electronic resource: http://fields.scripps.edu/sequest/index.html. Date of circulation 03.04.2018]

65. X! Tandem open source is software that can match tandem mass spectra with peptide sequences, in a process that has come to be known as protein identification. [Electronic resource: http://www.thegpm.org/tandem. Date of circulation 11.04.2018]

66. Sparkman, D. (2012). Informatics and mass‑spectral data-bases in the evaluation of environmental mass spectral data. Saint Albans: ILMPublications.—528 p.

67. Joint Center for Computational Biology and Informatics. [Electronic resource: http://www.jcbi.ru/index.html. Date of circulation 10.05.2018]

68. Hamm, C., Wilson, W., Harvan, D. (1986). Peptide sequencing program. Computer Applications in the Biosciences, 2(2), 115–118.

69. Berizovskaya, E.I., Ihalaynen, A.A., Antohin, A.M., Taranchenko, V.F., Goncharov, V.M., Mitrofanov, D.A., Aksenov, A.V., Rodin, I.A., Shpigun, O.A. (2014). Capability of high resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry in the determination of monoisotopic molecular masses of the recombinant human insulin and its analogues Mass spectrometry,11 (4), 231–238. (In Russian)

70. Vostrikova, N.L., Chernukha, I.M., Kulikovskiy, A.V., Shishkin, S.S. (2016). Study and identification of main proteins and peptides to determine the content of muscle protein in structureless cooked products by the method of two-dimensional electrophoresis followed by the time‑of‑flight mass spectrometry identification. Foods and Raw Materials, 4(2), 136–147.

71. Vostrikova, N.L., Kulikovskiy, A.V., Chernukha, I.M., Kovalev, L.I., Savchuk, S.A. (2017). Determination of muscle proteins by 2D methods of electrophoresis and time‑of‑flight mass spectrometry. Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 72(10), 1102–1112. (In Russian)