A system approach to simulation of individual food products
https://doi.org/10.21323/2414-438X-2020-5-3-12-17
Аннотация
There is no doubt that the further development in the field of nutrition is linked with personalization. Nutrition management with account for metabolism plays a key role in health strengthening and prevention of human diseases. The paper gives a review of studies associated with personalized nutrition. Personalized nutrition is inextricably linked with personalized food products. At present, however, mass production of personalized food products for individuals or small groups of people is unfeasible. The devel‑ opment of personalized food products requires both time and labor input, as well as multidisciplinary and profound knowledge in a wide spectrum of areas associated with biology, medicine, nutrition and food systems. Among the most important characteristics of modern science is the study of complex and super-complex organized objects such as the food system. These objects were studied previously but by the way of significant simplification of their structure. Investigation of objects with all variety and complexity of their organization requires not only new scientific ideas but also a new conceptual framework, new research methodology, new approaches to simulation of both products and physiological processes. In this study, the authors made an attempt to bring the theoretical view on an individual product closer to the complex task solution using the method of mathematical physiology. The intuitive conceptual model for a process of food design is shown with regard to the “health passport” of an individual, disease risk and gastrointestinal (GI) tract status. The differential equations of the concentration dynamics of protein, denatured protein and peptides in the human stomach are presented. The differential equations that describe the process of protein assimilation in the human stomach were solved in the simulation environment Simplex 3. The presented fragments of model realization show the pos‑ sibility of virtual study on an effect of different indicators of the food nutritional value on the rate of digestion and the process of cleavage of complex components (proteins, fats and carbohydrates) to mono-structural elements depending on different state and influence factors.
Ключевые слова
Об авторах
A. Lisitsyn
V. M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems of Russian Academy of Sciences
Россия
Россия
I. Chernukha
V. M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems of Russian Academy of Sciences
Россия
Россия
M. Nikitina
V. M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems of Russian Academy of Sciences
Россия
Россия
Список литературы
1. Williams, R.J. (1956). Biochemical Individuality: The Basis for the Genetotrophic Concept. New York: John Wiley & Sons. — 272 p.
2. Levy, S., Sutton, G., Ng, P.C., Feuk, L, Halpern, A.L., et al. (2007). The Diploid Genome Sequence of an Individual Human. Plos Biology, 5(10), e254. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050254
3. Celis-Morales, C., Mathers, J.C., Cibney, M., Walsh, M., et al. (2015). White paper on personalised nutrition — paving a way to better population health. Technical Report. — 101 p. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.13147.16166
4. EU‑funded Food4Me project paves way for personalised nutri‑ tion to better public health. Food Today. — 2015. — Vol. 97.
5. Celis-Morales, C., Livingstone, K.M., Marsaux, C.F.M., et al. (2015). Design and baseline characteristics of the Food4Me study: a web-based randomised controlled trial of personalised nutrition in seven European countries. Genes&Nutrition, 10(1), article num‑ ber 450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12263–014–0450–2
6. Franklin, D., Andrews, J. (2012). Megachange: the world in 2050. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. — 320 p. ISBN 1118180445
7. King, T., Cole, M., Farber, J.M., Eisenbrand, G., Zabaras, D., Fox, E.F., Hill, J.P. (2017). Food safety for food security: Relationship between global megatrends and developments in food safety. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 68, 160–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2017.08.014
8. Ueland, Ø., Altintzoglou, T., Kirkhus, B., Lindberg, D., Rognså, G.H., Rosnes, J.T., Rud, I., Varela, P. (2020). Perspectives on personalised food. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 102, 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.05.021
9. Neeha, V.S., Kinth, P. (2013). Nutrigenomics research: a review. Journal Food Science and Technology, 50(3), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197–012–0775-z
10. Willett, W.C. (2002). Balancing life-style and genomics research for disease prevention. Science, 296(5568), 695–698. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1071055
11. Chang, A.Y., Skirbekk, V.F., Tyrovolas, S., Kassebaum, N.J., Dieleman, J.L. (2019). Measuring population ageing: an analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet Public Health, 4, 3, e159-e167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468–2667(19)30019–2
12. Socio-demographic Index (SDI) [Electronic resource: http://www.healthdata.org/taxonomy/glossary/socio-demographic-index-sdi. Access date 14.08.2020] (in Russian)
13. von Bertalanffy, L. (1950). The Theory of Open Systems in Physics and Biology. Science, 111(2872), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.111.2872.23
14. Sovetov, B. Ya., Yakovlev, S.A. (2017). Systems simulation. Moscow: Yuriat. — 343 p. (in Russian)
15. Buslenko, N.P. (1988). Complex systems simulation. Mos‑ cow: Science. — 400 p. (in Russian)
16. Vavilov, A.A. (1983). Simulation modeling of production sys‑ tems. Moscow: Mashinostroenie. — 417 p. (in Russian)
17. Kosturiak, J., Gregor, M. (1995). Simulation von productions‑ systemen. Berlin: Springer. — 180 p. ISBN 978–3–211–82701–7, https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3–7091–9413–3 (In Germany)
18. Shannon, R.E. (1975). Systems simulation. The art and sci‑ ence. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. — 387 p.
19. Schmidt, B. (2001). The art of modelling and simulation: in‑ troduction to the simulation system Simplex3. Ghent.: SCS Eu‑ ropa BVBA. — 500 p. ISBN 3–936150–26–5
20. Ivashkin, Yu.A. (2016). Multi-agent modeling in simulation system Simplex3. Moscow: Knowledge Laboratory — 360 p. ISBN 978–5–906828–72–9 (in Russian)
21. Keener, J., Sneyd, J. Mathematical Physiology. New York: Springer-Verlag. — 547 p. ISBN 978–1–4899–8670–2, https://doi.org/10.1007/978–0–387–75847–3
22. Murray, J. D. (2002). Mathematical Biology. New York: Springer-Verlag. — 551 p. ISBN 978–0–387–95228–4
23. Michaelis, L., Menten, М. L. (1913). Die Kinetik der Invertinwirkung. BiochemischeZeitschrift, 49, 333–369. (In Germany)
24. Lisitsyn, A.B., Chernukha, I.M., Nikitina, M.A. (2019). Development of a personalized meat product using structural-parametric modeling. Theory and practice of meat processing, 4(3), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.21323/2414–438X‑2019–4–3–11–18
25. Ivashkin, Yu.A., Nikitina, M.A. (2018). The concept of biological compatibility in optimization of a human diet. Science intensive technologies, 19, 3, 33–45. (in Russian)
26. Ivashkin, Yu.A., Nikitina, M.A. (2017). Multi-agent simulation model of human gastrointestinal tract. Mathematical Methods in Technique and Technologies — MMTT, 5, 77–84. (in Russian)
27. Polenov, S.A., Troitskaya, V.K., Vershinina, E.A. (2003). Regulation of the digestive process: the main mechanisms and their computer simulation. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology, (Application) 4, 25–29. (in Russian)
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
, , . Теория и практика переработки мяса. 2020;5(3):12-17. https://doi.org/10.21323/2414-438X-2020-5-3-12-17
For citation:
Lisitsyn A.B., Chernukha I.M., Nikitina M.A. A system approach to simulation of individual food products. Theory and practice of meat processing. 2020;5(3):12-17. https://doi.org/10.21323/2414-438X-2020-5-3-12-17
Просмотров:
744
Послать статью по эл. почте 