Preview

Theory and practice of meat processing

Advanced search

Comparative proteomic study of muscle tissue of wild boars and domestic pig breeds.

https://doi.org/10.21323/2414-438X-2025-10-4-338-350

Abstract

In the modern conditions, there is a growing consumer interest in products from local (autochthonous) breeds of animals raised in extensive animal husbandry systems. Meat of such animals is often associated with high quality characteristics; however, its molecular foundations remain to be studied insufficiently. Comparative analysis of proteomic profiles of such breeds and their wild ancestor — wild boar — is of particular interest for understanding the fundamental consequences of domestication and selection as well as for revealing key marker proteins determining meat product properties. A comparative proteomic analysis of muscle tissue (M. longissimus dorsi) of wild boar and four pig breeds (Livny breed, Altai meat-type breed, Landrace, Mangalitsa) was carried out to reveal breed-specific molecular patterns associated with key meat quality characteristics. Proteomic profile was studied by two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE) and mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF/TOF). Functional analysis of protein-protein interactions and gene ontology (GO) enrichment were carried out using the STRING database. Twenty one proteins forming a functionally linked network were identified. Significant breed related differences in the composition and modifications of proteins of the contractile apparatus (products of MYL1, MYL2, MYL3, MYL6B, TNNT3, TNNI2 genes), energy metabolism (products of ENO3, ALDOA, CKM, AK1, ATP5F1A genes) and stress response (products of CRYAB, HSPB6 genes) were revealed. The highest degree of proteome transformation was noticed in the Livny breed, which demonstrated a significant similarity with wild boar in terms of several parameters including appearance of atypical myosin light chain MYL6B and a decrease in the level of muscle enolase (products of ENO3 gene). For Mangalitsa, a unique modification of the pattern of expression of myosin light chains and a significant increase in the level of small chaperons were characteristic, which correlates with the conditions of its free-range keeping. Bioinformatics analysis in STRING corroborated statistically significant formation of functional clusters responsible for muscle contraction, metabolism and maintenance of proteostasis. The data obtained suggest that both gene pool (breed) and environmental factors (keeping conditions) exert a complex effect on the proteomic landscape. The revealed protein signatures and their network interactions not only deepen the understanding of the biological foundations of meat quality but also open new prospects for the development of molecular markers in breeding and meat industry aimed at production of products with target properties.

About the Authors

I. M. Chernukha
V.M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems
Russian Federation

Irina M. Chernukha, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Academician of RAS, Principal Researcher, Experimental Clinic-Laboratory of Biologically Active Substances of an Animal Origin



L. I. Kovalev
Federal Research Centre “Fundamentals of Biotechnology” of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Leonid I. Kovalev, Doctor of Biological Sciences, Leading Researcher, Laboratory of Structural Protein Biochemistry



N. I. Markov
Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Nikolay I. Markov, Candidate of Biological Sciences, Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Ecology of Game Animals



E. A. Kotenkova
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology
Russian Federation

Elena A. Kotenkova, Candidate of Technical Sciences, Researcher, Laboratory of Nanobiotechnologies



E. R. Vasilevskaya
V.M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems
Russian Federation

Ekaterina R. Vasilevskaya, Candidate of Technical Sciences, Researcher, Experimental Clinic-Laboratory of Biologically Active Substances of an Animal Origin



M. E. Spirina
V.M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems
Russian Federation

Maria E. Spirina, Engineer Researcher, Experimental Clinic-Laboratory of Biologically Active Substances of Animal Origin



E. K. Polishchuk
V.M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems
Russian Federation

Ekaterina K. Polishchuk, Junior Researcher, Experimental Clinic-Laboratory of Biologically Active Substances of an Animal Origin



L. V. Fedulova
V.M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems
Russian Federation

Liliya V. Fedulova, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Experimental Clinic-Laboratory of Biologically Active Substances of an Animal Origin



References

1. Zhao, K., Lisitsyn, A.B., Zhang, J., Chernukha, I.M., Li, H.H., Lunina, O.I. et al. (2023). Comparative analysis of local pig breeds in China and Russia. Theory and Practice of Meat Processing, 8(4), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.21323/2414-438X-2023-8-4-347-360

2. Ludwiczak, A., Kasprowicz-Potocka, M., Zaworska-Zakrzewska, A., Składanowska-Baryza, J., Rodriguez-Estevez, V., Sanz-Fernandez, S. et al. (2023). Husbandry practices associated with extensification in European pig production and their effects on pork quality. Meat Science, 206, Article 109339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2023.109339

3. Estévez, M., Morcuende, D., López, R. С. (2003). Physico-chemical characteristics of M. Longissimus dorsi from three lines of free-range reared Iberian pigs slaughtered at 90 kg live-weight and commercial pigs: A comparative study. Meat Science, 64(4), 499–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00228-0

4. Kim, G.-W., Kim, H.-Y. (2018). Physicochemical proper ties of M. longissimus dorsi of Korean native pigs. Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 60(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40781-018-0163-y

5. Yang, H., Xu, X.-l., Ma, H.-m., Jiang, J. (2016). Integrative analysis of transcriptomics and proteomics of skeletal muscles of the Chinese indigenous Shaziling pig compared with the Yorkshire breed. BMC Genetics, 17(1), Article 80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-016-0389-y

6. Wang, Z., Shang, P., Li, Q., Wang, L., Chamba, Y., Zhang, B. et al. (2017). iTRAQ-based proteomic analysis reveals key proteins affecting muscle growth and lipid deposition in pigs. Scientific Reports, 7(1), Article 46717. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep46717

7. Wang, J., Xiao, J., Liu, X., Gao, Y., Luo, Z., Gu, X. et al. (2021). Tandem mass tag-labeled quantitative proteomic analysis of tenderloins between Tibetan and Yorkshire pigs. Meat Science, 172, Article 108343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108343

8. Pan, P., Qin, Z., Xie, W., Chen, B., Guan, Z., Xie, B. (2023). Identification of differentially expressed genes in the Lon gissimus dorsi muscle of Luchuan and Duroc pigs by transcriptome sequencing. Genes, 14(1), Article 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14010132

9. Kim, N.-Y., Lee, S., Kim, H.-A., Kang, Y.-J., Cho, I.-C., Park, J.-E. (2025). Comparative analysis of meat quality and muscle transcriptome between landrace and Jeju native pig. Food Science of Animal Resources, 45(6), 1770-1789. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2025.e20

10. Chernukha, I., Abdelmanova, A., Kotenkova, E., Kharzinova, V., Zinovieva, N. (2022). Assessing genetic diversity and searching for selection signatures by comparison between the Indigenous Livni and Duroc Breeds in local livestock of the Central Region of Russia. Diversity, 14(10), Article 859. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14100859

11. Matsumoto, H., Haniu, H., Kurien, B. T., Komori, N. (2019). Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis by glass tube-based IEF and SDS-PAGE. Electrophoretic separation of proteins. Chapter in a book: Methods in Molecular Biology. New York: Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8793-1_11

12. Ahremko, A.G. (2019). Application of two-dimensional electrophoresis method for assessing meat products composition on model stuffing example. Vsyo o Myase, 3, 46–48. https://doi.org/10.21323/2071-2499-2019-3-46-48

13. Kovalyov, L.I., Shishkin, S.S., Kovalyova, M.A., Ivanov, A.V, Vostrikova, N.L., Tchernukha, I.M. (2013). Proteomic research proteins in a sample of pork meat products. Vsyo o Myase, 3, 32–34.

14. Kovalyov, L.I., Kovalyova, M.A., Kovalyov, P.L., Serebryakova, M.V., Moshkovskii, S.A., Shishkin, S.S. (2006). Polymorphism of Δ3,5-Δ2,4-dienoyl-coenzyme A isomerase (the ECH1 gene product protein) in human striated muscle tis sue. Biochemistry (Moscow), 71(4), 448–453. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006297906040146

15. Shishkin, S.S., Kovalyov, L.I., Kovalyova, M.A., Lisitskaya, K.V, Eremina, L.S., Ivanov, A.V. et al. (2010). “Prostate Cancer Proteomics” Database. ActaNaturae, 2(4), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.32607/20758251-2010-2-4-95-104

16. Zvereva, E.A., Kovalev, L.I., Ivanov, A.V., Kovaleva, M.A., Zherdev, A.V., Shishkin, S.S. et al. (2015). Enzyme immunoassay and proteomic characterization of troponin I as a marker of mammalian muscle compounds in raw meat and some meat products. Meat Science, 105, 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.03.001

17. A. N. Bach Institute of Biochemistry (2012). Multi-Level Information Database “Muscle organs proteomics.” Retrieved from http://mp.inbi.ras.ru/index.php/admin/mainpage?lang=eng. Accessed October 10, 2025.

18. STRING Consortium (2025). STRING Protein-Protein Inter action Networks Functional Enrichment Analysis. Retrieved from https://string-db.org/. Accessed October 10, 2025.

19. Szklarczyk, D., Kirsch, R., Koutrouli, M., Nastou, K., Mehryary, F., Hachilif, R. et al. (2023). The STRING database in 2023: Protein-protein association networks and function al enrichment analyses for any sequenced genome of inter est. Nucleic Acids Research, 51(D1), D638-D646. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac1000

20. Chin, H.S., Li, M.X., Tan, I.K.L., Ninnis, R.L., Reljic, B., Scicluna, K. et al. (2018). VDAC2 enables BAX to mediate apoptosis and limit tumor development. Nature Communications, 9(1), Article 4976. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07309-4

21. Heirbaut, M., Beelen, S., Strelkov, S.V., Weeks, S.D. (2014). Dissecting the functional role of the N-Terminal domain of the human small heat shock protein HSPB6. PLoS ONE, 9(8), Article e105892. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105892

22. Eastham, M.J., Pelava, A., Wells, G.R., Watkins, N.J., Schneider, C. (2023). RPS27a and RPL40, which are produced as ubiqui tin fusion proteins, are not essential for p53 signalling. Biomolecules, 13(6), Article 898. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13060898

23. StatPearls (2025). Biochemistry, Ubiquitination. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK556052/. Accessed October 13, 2025.

24. Logvinova, D.S., Levitsky, D.I. (2018). Essential light chains of myosin and their role in functioning of the myosin motor. Biochemistry (Moscow), 83(8), 944–960. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006297918080060

25. Chang, A.N., Mahajan, P., Knapp, S., Barton, H., Sweeney, H.L., Kamm, K.E. et al. (2016). Cardiac myosin light chain is phosphorylated by Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent and -independent kinase activities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(27), E3824-E3833. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1600633113

26. Russell, B., Solís, C. (2021). Mechanosignaling pathways alter muscle structure and function by post-translational modification of existing sarcomeric proteins to optimize energy us age. Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility, 42(2), 367– 380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10974-021-09596-9

27. Dimauro, I., Caporossi, D. (2022). Alpha B-Crystallin in mus cle disease prevention: The role of physical activity. Molecules, 27(3), Article 1147. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27031147

28. Schlesinger, D.H., Goldstein, G. (1975). Molecular conservation of 74 amino acid sequence of ubiquitin between cattle and man. Nature, 255(5507), 423–424. https://doi.org/10.1038/255423a0

29. Chen, G., Cheng, X., Shi, G., Zou, C., Chen, L., Li, J. et al. (2019). Transcriptome analysis reveals the effect of long inter genic noncoding RNAs on pig muscle growth and fat deposition. BioMed Research International, 2019, Article 2951427. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2951427

30. Wei, W., Zha, C., Jiang, A., Chao, Z., Hou, L., Liu, H. et al. (2022). A combined differential proteome and transcriptome profiling of fast and slow-twitch skeletal muscle in pigs. Foods, 11(18), Article 2842. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11182842

31. Puig-Oliveras, A., Ramayo-Caldas, Y., Corominas, J., Estellé, J., Pérez-Montarelo, D., Hudson, N.J. et al. (2014). Differ ences in muscle transcriptome among pigs phenotypically extreme for fatty acid composition. PLoS ONE, 9(6), Article e99720. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099720

32. Nonneman, D.J., Keel, B.N., Lindholm-Perry, A.K., Rohrer, G.A., Wheeler, T.L., Shackelford, S.D. et al. (2022). Transcriptomic analysis for pork color — The ham halo effect in bi ceps femoris. Meat and Muscle Biology, 6(1), Article 13050. https://doi.org/10.22175/mmb.13050

33. Zhao, X., Mo, D., Li, A., Gong, W., Xiao, S., Zhang, Y. et al. (2011). Comparative analyses by sequencing of transcriptomes during skeletal muscle development between pig breeds differ ing in muscle growth rate and fatness. PLoS ONE, 6(5), Article e19774. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019774

34. Huang, Z., Li, Q., Li, M., Li, C. (2021). Transcriptome analysis reveals the long intergenic noncoding RNAs contributed to skeletal muscle differences between Yorkshire and Tibetan pig. Scientific Reports, 11(1), Article 2622. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82126-2

35. Ngu, N.T., Nhan, N.T.H. (2012). Analysis of troponin I gene polymorphisms and meat quality in Mongcai pigs. South African Journal of Animal Science, 42(3), 288–295. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v42i3.11

36. Yang, H., Xu, Z.Y., Lei, M.G., Li, F.E., Deng, C.Y., Xiong, Y.Z. et al. (2010). Association of 3 polymorphisms in porcine troponin I genes (TNNI1 andTNNI2) with meat quality traits. Journal of Applied Genetics, 51(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03195710

37. Yang, Y., Wang, X., Wang, S., Chen, Q., Li, M., Lu, S. (2023). Identification of potential sex-specific biomarkers in pigs with low and high intramuscular fat content using integrated bioinformatics and machine learning. Genes, 14(9), Arti cle 1695. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14091695

38. Ropka-Molik, K., Bereta, A., Żukowski, K., Tyra, M., Piórkowska, K., Żak, G. et al. (2018). Screening for candidate genes related with histological microstructure, meat quality and carcass characteristic in pig based on RNA-seq data. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 31(10), 1565– 1574. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0714

39. Yang, Y., Liang, G., Niu, G., Zhang, Y., Zhou, R., Wang, Y. et al. (2017). Comparative analysis of DNA methylome and transcriptome of skeletal muscle in lean-, obese-, and mini type pigs. Scientific Reports, 7(1), Article 39883. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39883

40. Heller, S.A., Shih, R., Kalra, R., Kang, P.B. (2020). Emery‐ Dreifuss muscular dystrophy. Muscle and Nerve, 61(4), 436– 448. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.26782

41. Johnson, L.G., Zhai, C., Reever, L.M., Prusa, K.J., Nair, M.N., Huff-Lonergan, E. et al. (2023). Characterizing the sarcoplasmic proteome of aged pork chops classified by purge loss. Journal of Animal Science, 101, Article skad046. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skad046

42. Picard, B., Lebret, B., Cassar-Malek, I., Liaubet, L., Berri, C., Le Bihan-Duval, E. et al. (2015). Recent advances in omic technologies for meat quality management. Meat Science, 109, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.05.003

43. Zorc, M., Škorput, D., Gvozdanović, K., Margeta, P., Karolyi, D., Luković, Z. et al. (2022). Genetic diversity and population structure of six autochthonous pig breeds from Croatia, Serbia, and Slovenia. Genetics Selection Evolution, 54(1), Article 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-022-00718-6

44. Kim, B.-U., Kim, S.-W., Hong, Y.-H., Jeong, M.-A., Ryu, Y. S., Park, H.-C. et al. (2012). Protein expression in pig species longissimus dorsi muscles among different breeds and growth stages. Journal of Life Science, 22(6), 713–722. https://doi.org/10.5352/JLS.2012.22.6.713

45. Wu, J., Zhou, D., Deng, C., Wu, X., Long, L., Xiong, Y. (2008). Characterization of porcine ENO3: Genomic and cDNA structure, polymorphism and expression. Genetics Selection Evolution, 40(5), Article 563. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-40-5-563

46. Zhao, Y., Chen, X., Li, Q., Ma, J., Dong, Y., Wang, D. et al. (2022). Polymorphism of ENO3 gene and its correlation with growth traits in Yorkshire pigs. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 49, 188–196. (In Chinese)

47. Zhang, X., Lin, Q., Liao, W., Zhang, W., Li, T., Li, J. et al. (2023). Identification of new candidate genes related to semen traits in duroc pigs through weighted single-step GWAS. Animals, 13(3), Article 365. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13030365

48. Terenina, E., Sautron, V., Ydier, C., Bazovkina, D., Sevin-Pujol, A., Gress, L. et al. (2017). Time course study of the response to LPS targeting the pig immune gene networks. BMC Genomics, 18(1), Article 988. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-4363-5

49. Kitajima, Y., Yoshioka, K., Suzuki, N. (2020). The ubiqui tin — proteasome system in regulation of the skeletal muscle homeostasis and atrophy: From basic science to disorders. The Journal of Physiological Sciences, 70(1), Article 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12576-020-00768-9

50. Wang, F., Zha, Z., He, Y., Li, J., Zhong, Z., Xiao, Q. et al. (2023). Genome-wide re-sequencing data reveals the population structure and selection signatures of Tunchang Pigs in China. Animals, 13(11), Article 1835. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13111835


Review

For citations:


Chernukha I.M., Kovalev L.I., Markov N.I., Kotenkova E.A., Vasilevskaya E.R., Spirina M.E., Polishchuk E.K., Fedulova L.V. Comparative proteomic study of muscle tissue of wild boars and domestic pig breeds. Theory and practice of meat processing. 2025;10(4):338-350. https://doi.org/10.21323/2414-438X-2025-10-4-338-350

Views: 23

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2414-438X (Print)
ISSN 2414-441X (Online)