Biotechnological techniques for intensification of protein extraction from the porcine pancreas
https://doi.org/10.21323/2414-438X-2022-7-4-258-264
Аннотация
Processing of secondary products after slaughter of farm animals is in demand. The pancreas is a rich source of bioactive protein substances, effective extraction of which is a serious problem today due to their aggregation. The aim of the work was to assess the extractivity of protein substances of the porcine pancreas using sodium chloride, trehalose, arginine, and combination of glycine and proline. The protein concentration was determined in the obtained extracts by the biuret reaction and their protein composition was assessed by densitometry of two-dimensional electropherograms using software ImageMaster™ 2D Platinum powered by Melanie 8.0. The results showed a positive effect of anti-aggregation agents on the release of protein substances into a solution. The highest protein concentration (33.36±0.64 g/l) was observed when adding 1М L-arginine; however, it was conditioned mainly by an increase in the content of three major protein fractions rather than by diversity of the protein composition. In general, the use of 0.9% NaCl as an extractive agent was quite effective, but selectivity to certain protein groups was observed for anti-aggregation agents such as sodium chloride, trehalose, arginine, glycine and proline, as well as their combination. The obtained results are important for intensifying extraction of protein substances including target ones with the subsequent application in different fields.
Ключевые слова
Об авторах
E. KotenkovaРоссия
A. Akhremko
Россия
E. Polishchuk
Россия
M. Aryuzina
Россия
M. Spirina
Россия
Список литературы
1. Alao, B., Falowo, A., Chulayo, A., Muchenje, V. (2017). The potential of animal by-products in food systems: Production, prospects and challenges. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(7), Article 1089. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071089
2. Marti, D. L., Johnson, R. J., Mathews, K. H. Jr. (2011). Where’s the (Not) Meat? Byproducts From Beef and Pork Production. Retrieved from https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/outlooks/37427/8801_ldpm20901.pdf. Accessed October 3, 2022.
3. Jayathilakan, K., Sultana, K., Radhakrishna, K., Bawa, A.S. (2012). Utilization of byproducts and waste materials from meat, poultry and fish processing industries: a review. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 49(3), 278–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197–011–0290–7
4. Nasonova, V. V. (2018). Perspective ways the use of byproducts. Theory and Practice of Meat Processing, 3(3), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.21323/2414–438X-2018–3–3–64–73
5. Velenturf, A. P. M., Purnell, P. (2021). Principles for a sustainable circular economy. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1437–1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.018
6. Ladisch, M. R., Kohlmann, K. L. (1992). Recombinant human insulin. Biotechnology Progress, 8(6), 469–478. https://doi.org/10.1021/bp00018a001
7. Siew, Y. Y., Zhang, W. (2021). Downstream processing of recombinant human insulin and its analogues production from E. coli inclusion bodies. Bioresources and Bioprocessing, 8(1), Article 65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643–021–00419-w
8. UniProt Protein Database (2022). Retrieved from http://www.uniprot.org/. Accessed July 3, 2022.
9. Vasilevskaya, E. R., Aryuzina, M. A., Vetrova, E. S. (2021). Comparative study of technologies for extraction of biologically active substances from the raw material of animal origin. Theory and Practice of Meat Processing, 6(3), 226–235. https://doi.org/10.21323/2414–438X-2021–6–3–226–235
10. Dobson, C. M. (2004). Principles of protein folding, misfolding and aggregation. Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology, 15(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2003.12.008
11. Wang, W., Nema, S., Teagarden, D. (2010). Protein aggregation — Pathways and influencing factors. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 390(2), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.02.025
12. Alam, P., Siddiqi, K., Chturvedi, S. K., Khan, R. H. (2017). Protein aggregation: From background to inhibition strategies. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 103, 208–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.048
13. Hamada, H., Arakawa, T., Shiraki, K. (2009). Effect of additives on protein aggregation. Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, 10(4), 400–407. https://doi.org/10.2174/138920109788488941
14. Akhremko, A., Vasilevskaya, E. R., Fedulova, L. (2020). Adaptation of two-dimensional electrophoresis for muscle tissue analysis. Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences, 14, 595– 601. https://doi.org/10.5219/1380
15. Lebendiker, M., Danieli, T. (2014). Production of prone-to-aggregate proteins. FEBS Letters, 588(2), 236–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2013.10.044
16. Vasilevskaya, E. R., Aryuzina, M. A., Vetrova, E. S. (2021). Saline extraction as a method of obtaining a mixture of biologically active compounds of protein nature from a porcine pancreas. Food Systems, 4(2), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.21323/2618–9771–2020–4–2–97–105 (In Russian)
17. Bondos, S. E., Bicknell, A. (2003). Detection and prevention of protein aggregation before, during, and after purification. Analytical Biochemistry, 316(2), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003–2697(03)00059–9
18. Li, J., Chen, J., An, L., Yuan, X., Yao, L. (2020). Polyol and sugar osmolytes can shorten protein hydrogen bonds to modulate function. Communications Biology, 3(1), Article 528. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003–020–01260–1
19. Schein, C. H. (1990). Solubility as a function of protein structure and solvent components. Nature Biotechnology, 8(4), 308– 317. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0490–308
20. Jain, N. K., Roy, I. (2008). Effect of trehalose on protein structure. Protein Science, 18(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.3
21. Olsson, C., Swenson, J. (2019). The role of disaccharides for protein–protein interactions — a SANS study. Molecular Physics, 117(22), 3408–3416. https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2019.1640400
22. Das, U., Hariprasad, G., Ethayathulla, A.S., Manral, P., Das, T.K., Pasha, S. et al. (2007). Inhibition of protein aggregation: Supramolecular assemblies of arginine hold the key. PLoS ONE, 2(11), Article e1176. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001176
23. Tsumoto, K., Umetsu, M., Kumagai, I., Ejima, D., Philo, J.S., Arakawa, T. (2004). Role of arginine in protein refolding, solubilization, and purification. Biotechnology Progress, 20(5), 1301– 1308. https://doi.org/10.1021/bp0498793
24. Shiraki, K., Kudou, M., Fujiwara, S., Imanaka, T., Takagi, M. (2002). Biophysical effect of amino acids on the prevention of protein aggregation. Journal of Biochemistry, 132(4), 591–595. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a003261
25. Platts, L., Falconer, R. J. (2015). Controlling protein stability: Mechanisms revealed using formulations of arginine, glycine and guanidinium HCl with three globular proteins. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 486(1–2), 131–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.03.051
26. Rajan, R., Ahmed, S., Sharma, N., Kumar, N., Debas, A., Matsumura, K. (2021). Review of the current state of protein aggregation inhibition from a materials chemistry perspective: special focus on polymeric materials. Materials Advances, 2(4), 1139– 1176. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0MA00760A
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
, , , , . Теория и практика переработки мяса. 2022;7(4):258-264. https://doi.org/10.21323/2414-438X-2022-7-4-258-264
For citation:
Kotenkova E.A., Akhremko A.G., Polishchuk E.K., Aryuzina M.A., Spirina M.E. Biotechnological techniques for intensification of protein extraction from the porcine pancreas. Theory and practice of meat processing. 2022;7(4):258-264. https://doi.org/10.21323/2414-438X-2022-7-4-258-264