Preview

Theory and practice of meat processing

Advanced search

SUBSTANTIATION OF THE METHOD OF MEAT SAMPLE PREPARATION FOR INSTRUMENTAL DETERMINATION OF CONSISTENCY

https://doi.org/10.21323/2414-438X-2019-4-3-7-10

Full Text:

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a transformation in the choice and lifestyle of Russian citizens. An increasing part of the population makes a more reasonable choice, taking into account all aspects, including the most important for meat products — these are organoleptic characteristics, in particular the consistency of the product. Consumers prefer products with the delicate, soft texture, expect good «biteness» and «cheweness». Therefore, preference is given to tender, juicy meat with a low content of connective tissue. The most commonly used method for testing meat consistency in laboratories around the world is a method that uses strength testing machines with a Warner-Bratzler blade (WB blade). In this work, the Shimadzu AGS-1kN universal testing machine (Japan) was chosen for research. Samples obtained from l. dorsi of pork and beef were selected as meat raw materials. To determine the optimal and reproducible method of sample preparation, some of them were subjected to heat treatment before analysis. In the study of samples without heat treatment, deviations from the average were more than 11%. After meat was cooked, a decrease in the relative standard deviation of the maximum shear stress from the average was achieved: from 11% in raw meat to 5% in a pork sample and 5.3% in a beef sample. The heat treatment of pre-cut samples led to a change in their geometric shape, which created additional difficulties for obtaining correct results, and also negatively affected the increase in the relative deviation to 15.5% for beef.

About the Authors

Kirill I. Spiridonov
V. M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems of Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Candidate of technical sciences, senior research scientist

109316, Moscow, Talalikhina str., 26. Tel: +7–495–676–71–11.



Victoria V. Nasonova
V. M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems of Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Candidate of technical sciences, chef of department

109316, Moscow, Talalikhina str., 26. Tel.: +7–495–676–65–51.



Elena K. Tunieva
V. M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems of Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Candidate of technical sciences, leading research scientist

109316, Moscow, Talalikhina str., 26. Tel.: +7–495–676–71–11.



References

1. Szczesniak, A. S. (1986). Sensory texture evaluation methodology. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Reciprocal Meat Conference of the American Meat Science Association, Chicago, IL: National Livestock and Meat Board, 39, 86–96.

2. Aberle, E.D., Forrest J. C., Gerrard D. E., Mills E. W. (2001). Principles of Meat Science. 4th ed. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company; Dubuque, IA, USA. — 376 p. ISBN 0787247200

3. Ball, C.O., Clauss, H.E., Stier, E.F. (1957). Factors affecting quality of prepackaged meat: Loss of weight and study of texture. Food Technology, 11, 281–284.

4. Zheng, L., Da-Wen Sun, D.-W., Tan, J. (2008). Quality evaluation of meat cuts. Book Chapter in Computer Vision Technology for Food Quality Evaluation, 111–138. DOI: 10.1016/B978–012373642–0.50008–9

5. Behrends, J.M., Goodson, K.J., Koohmaraie, M., Shackelford, S.D., Wheeler, T.L., Morgan, W.W., Reagan, J.O., Gwartney, B.L., Wise, J.W., Savell, J.W. (2005). Beef customer satisfaction: USDA quality grade and marination effects on consumer evaluations of top round steaks. Journal of Animal Science, 83, 662–670.

6. Lyford, C., Thompson, J., Polkinghoresiane, R., Miller, M., Nishimura, T., Neath, K., Allen, P., Belasco, E., Lyford, C. (2010). Is willingness to pay (WTP) for beef quality grades affected by consumer demographics and meat consumption preferences. Australasian Agribusiness Review, 18, 1–17.

7. Destefanis, G., Brugiapaglia, A., Barge, M.T., Dal Molin, E. (2008). Relationship between beef consumer tenderness perception and Warner-Bratzler shear force. Meat Science, 78(3), 153–156. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.05.031

8. Novaković, S., Tomašević, I. (2017). A comparison between Warner-Bratzler shear force measurement and texture profile analysis of meat and meat products: A review. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 85(1), 012063. DOI: 10.1088/1755–1315/85/1/012063


For citation:


Spiridonov K.I., Nasonova V.V., Tunieva E.K. SUBSTANTIATION OF THE METHOD OF MEAT SAMPLE PREPARATION FOR INSTRUMENTAL DETERMINATION OF CONSISTENCY. Theory and practice of meat processing. 2019;4(3):7-10. https://doi.org/10.21323/2414-438X-2019-4-3-7-10

Views: 88


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2414-438X (Print)
ISSN 2414-441X (Online)