Assessment of the consumers’ attitude to the alternative meat. Review
https://doi.org/10.21323/2414-438X-2025-10-1-54-66
Аннотация
Cultivated meat technology is a new and pretty controversial food technology presented as a method of meat production without dependence on large-scale farming of industrial livestock. It is based on the principles of people’s humanistic attitude to animals and environmental care. The article summarizes the results of the “life cycle” assessment of the cultivated meat and the possible environmental effect of its production technology on global warming. The presented review is aimed at assessing consumer perception of cultivated meat by analyzing and systematizing the results of previous studies that examined the consumers’ attitudes to the risks and benefits of the alternative meat. Systematized research data allowed identifying key factors that influence onto the consumers’ perception of the food products. For example, one of the main reasons for a negative attitude towards cultivated meat is food neophobia. In addition, differences in this product acceptance by various consumers groups were analyzed. Generalization of the results allowed systematizing the motivators and barriers that may affect the mass consumption of the cultivated meat in the future, taking into account the innovations in the new food technologies development. Acceptance rates of the cultivated meat vary in relevance with demographics, socio-cultural, religious, ethical perceptions and traditions. However, it should be noted that there is no consensus on the perceived advantages, disadvantages, threats and opportunities of the consumers’ acceptance of the cultivated meat. This review notes that a number of studies show a relatively high level of consumer/population willingness to try the cultivated meat. However, the acceptance rates of the cultivated meat are generally lower than for other alternative proteins (e. g. legumes, plant-based meat). The main negative factor in the acceptance of the cultivated meat is that consumers perceive the cultivated meat as the unnatural one.
The study therefore examines various issues related to the formation of both positive and negative attitudes towards the cultivated meat. It also helps to better understanding the consumers’ psychology and allows more accurate prediction of their behavior.
Об авторе
N. А. Gorbunova
V.M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems
Россия
Россия
Nataliya A. Gorbunova - Candidate of Technical Sciences, Scientific Secretary, V. M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems.
26, Talalikhin str., 109316, Moscow. Tel.: +7–495–676–95–11 (316)
Список литературы
1. Pakseresht, A., Ahmadi Kaliji, S., Canavari, M. (2022). Review of factors affecting consumer acceptance of cultured meat. Appetite, 170, Article 105829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105829
2. Mahoney, B. (2022). Let them eat cultured meat: Diagnosing the potential for meat alternatives to increase inequity. Food Ethics, 7(2), Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41055-022-00108-0
3. Petrunina, I.V., Gorbunova, N.A., Zakharov, A.N. (2023). Assessment of causes and consequences of food and agricultural raw material loss and opportunities for its reduction. Theory and Practice of Meat Processing, 8(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.21323/2414-438X-2023-8-1-51-61
4. Stephens, N., Di Silvio, L., Dunsford, I., Ellis, M., Glencross, A., Sexton, A. (2018). Bringing cultured meat to market: Technical, socio-political, and regulatory challenges in cellular agriculture. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 78, 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2018.04.010
5. Lin-Hi, N., Schäfer, K., Blumberg, I., Hollands, L. (2022). The omnivore’s paradox and consumer acceptance of cultured meat: An experimental investigation into the role of perceived organizational competence and excitement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 338, Article 130593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130593
6. Lazarus, O., McDermid, S., Jacquet, J. (2021). The climate responsibilities of industrial meat and dairy producers. Climatic Change, 165(1), Article 30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03047-7
7. Godfray, H. C. J., Aveyard, P., Garnett, T., Hall, J. W., Key, T. J., Lorimer, J. et al. (2018) Meat consumption, health, and the environment. Science, 361, Article eaam5324. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5324
8. Hocquette, J.-F. (2023). Consumer perception of livestock production and meat consumption; an overview of the special issue “Perspectives on consumer attitudes to meat consumption”. Meat Science, 200, Article 109163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2023.109163
9. Biscarra-Bellio, J. C., de Oliveira, G. B., Marques, M. C. P., Molento C. F. M. (2023). Demand changes meat as changing meat reshapes demand: The great meat revolution. MeatScience, 196, Article 109040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2022.109040
10. Springmann, M., Clark, M., Mason-D’Croz, D., Wiebe, K., Bodirsky, B.L., Lassaletta, L. et al. (2018). Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature, 562(7728), 519–525. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0
11. Faccio, E., Guiotto Nai Fovino, L. (2019). Food neophobia or distrust of novelties? Exploring consumers’ attitudes toward GMOs, insects and cultured meat. Applied Sciences, 9(20), Article 4440. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9204440
12. Gómez-Luciano, C. A., de Aguiar, L. K., Vriesekoop, F., Urbano, B. (2019). Consumers’ willingness to purchase three alternatives to meat proteins in the United Kingdom, Spain, Brazil and the Dominican Republic. Food Quality and Preference, 78, Article 103732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103732
13. Wilks, M., Crimston, C. R., Hornsey M. J. (2024). Meat and morality: The moral foundation of purity, but not harm, predicts attitudes toward cultured meat, Appetite, 197, Article 107297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107297
14. Li, H., Van Loo, E. J., Trijp, H. C. M. van, Chen, J., Bai J. (2023). Will cultured meat be served on Chinese tables? A study of consumer attitudes and intentions about cultured meat in China. Meat Science, 197, Article 109081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2022.109081
15. Chriki, S., Ellies-Oury, M.-P., Hocquette, J.-F. (2022). Is “cultured meat” a viable alternative to slaughtering animals and a good comprise between animal welfare and human expectations? Animal Frontiers, 12(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/af/vfac002
16. Rodríguez Escobar, M. I., Cadena, E., Nhu, T. T., Cooreman-Algoed, M., De Smet, S., Dewulf, J. (2021). Analysis of the cultured meat production system in function of its environmental footprint: Current status, gaps and recommendations. Foods, 10(12), Article 2941. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10122941
17. Post, M. J. (2012). Cultured meat from stem cells: Challenges and prospects. Meat Science, 92 (3), 297–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.04.008
18. Tuomisto, H. L., Teixeira de Mattos, M. J. (2011). Environmental impacts of cultured meat production. Environmental Science and Technology, 45(14), 6117–6123. https://doi.org/10.1021/es200130u
19. Lynch, J., Pierrehumbert, R. (2019). Climate impacts of cultured meat and beef cattle. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 3, Article 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2019.00005
20. Lin-Hi, N., Reimer, M., Schäfer, K., Böttcher, J. (2023). Consumer acceptance of cultured meat: An empirical analysis of the role of organizational factors. Journal of Business Economics, 93(4), 707–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-022-01127-3
21. Jairath, G., Mal, G., Gopinath, D., Singh, B. (2021). A holistic approach to access the viability of cultured meat: A review. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 110, 700–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.02.024
22. Hocquette, J.-F. (2016). Is in vitro meat the solution for the future? Meat Science, 120, 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.04.036
23. Treich, N. (2021). Cultured meat: Promises and challenges. Environmental and Resource Economics, 79 (1), 33–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-021-00551-3
24. Patil Akshay, R., Bhavana, A., Patil Roopa, B., Deepak (2024). Cultured meat: The upcoming meat production having sustainable benefits over conventional meat production: A review. Agricultural Reviews, 45(1), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.R-2333
25. Mancini, M. C., Antonioli F. (2022). Italian consumers standing at the crossroads of alternative protein sources: Cultivated meat, insect-based and novel plant-based foods. Meat Science, 193, Article 108942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2022.108942
26. Chriki, S, Hocquette, J.-F. (2020). The myth of cultured meat: A Review. Frontiers in Nutrition, 7, Article 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2020.00007
27. Verbeke, W., Marcu, A., Rutsaert, P., Gaspar, R., Seibt, B., Fletcher, D. et al. (2015). ‘Would you eat cultured meat?’: Consumers’ reactions and attitude formation in Belgium, Portugal and the United Kingdom. Meat Science, 102, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.11.013
28. Wilks, M., Phillips, C. J. C., Fielding, K., Hornsey, M. J. (2019). Testing potential psychological predictors of attitudes towards cultured meat. Appetite, 136, 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.01.027
29. Bryant, C., Barnett, J. (2020). Consumer acceptance of cultured meat: An updated review (2018–2020). Applied Sciences, 10(15), Article 5201. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10155201
30. Mylan, J. (2018). Sustainable consumption in everyday life: A qualitative study of UK consumer experiences of meat reduction. Sustainability, 10(7), Article 2307. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072307
31. Meeprom, S., Jaratmetakul, P., Boonkum, W. (2023) Examining the effect of consumer experience on co-creation and loyalty for healthy meat consumption. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7, Article 1123984. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1123984
32. Torrico, D. D. (2021). Novel techniques to measure the sensory, emotional, and physiological responses of consumers toward foods. MDPI, 10(11), Article 2620. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112620
33. Miller, M. F., Hoover, L. C., Cook, K. D., Guerra, A. L., Huffman, K. L., Tinney, K. S., et al. (1995). Consumer acceptability of beef steak tenderness in the home and restaurant. Journal of Food Science, 60(5), 963–965. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1995.tb06271.x
34. Deliza, R., Rodríguez, B., Reinoso-Carvalho, F., Lucchese-Cheung, T. (2023). Cultured meat: A review on accepting challenges and upcoming possibilities. Current Opinion in Food Science, 52, Article 101050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2023.101050
35. Hefferon, K. L., De Steur, H., Perez-Cueto, F. J. A., Herring, R. (2023). Alternative protein innovations and challenges for industry and consumer: An initial overview. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7, Article 1038286. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1038286
36. Joseph, P., Searing, A., Watson, C., McKeague, J. (2020). Alternative proteins: Market research on consumer trends and emerging landscape. Meat and Muscle Biology, 4(2), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.22175/mmb.11225
37. Nawaz, A. H., Hussain, A., Fujian, W., Zhang, W. L., Zheng, J. H., Hai J. Z. et al. (2022). Future of cultured meat production: Hopes and hurdles. Future of Food: Journal on Food, Agriculture and Society, 10(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.17170/kobra-202204136014
38. Akinmeye, F., Chriki, S., Liu, C., Zhao, J., Ghnimi S. (2024). What factors influence consumer attitudes towards alternative proteins? Food and Humanity, 3, Article 100349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foohum.2024.100349
39. Lurie-Luke, E. (2024). Alternative protein sources: science powered startups to fuel food innovation. Nature Communications, 15(1), Article 4425. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47091-0
40. Andreoli, V., Bagliani, M., Corsi, A., Frontuto, V. (2021). Drivers of protein consumption: A cross-country analysis. Sustainability, 13(13), Article 7399. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137399
41. van der Weele, C., Feindt, P., Jan van der Goot, A., van Mierlo, B., van Boekel, M. (2019). Meat alternatives: An integrative comparison. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 88, 505–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.04.018
42. Sexton, A.E., Garnett, T., Lorimer, J. (2019). Framing the future of food: The contested promises of alternative proteins. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 2(1), 47–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848619827009
43. Parodi, A., Leip, A., De Boer, I. J. M., Slegers, P. M., Ziegler, F., Temme, E. H. M. et al. (2018). The potential of future foods for sustainable and healthy diets. Nature Sustainability, 1(12), 782–789. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0189-7
44. Mwangi, M. N., Oonincx, D. G. A. B., Stouten, T., Veenenbos, M., Melse-Boonstra, A., Dicke, M. et al. (2018). Insects as sources of iron and zinc in human nutrition. Nutrition Research Reviews, 31(2), 248–255. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954422418000094
45. Gorbunova, N. A., Zakharov, A. N. (2021). Edible insects as a source of alternative protein. A review. Theory and Practice of Meat Processing, 6(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.21323/2414–438X-2021-6-1-23-32
46. Gravel, A., Doyen, A. (2020). The use of edible insect proteins in food: Challenges and issues related to their functional properties. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, 59, Article 102272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2019.102272
47. Dobermann, D., Swift, J. A., Field, L. M. (2017). Opportunities and hurdles of edible insects for food and feed. Nutrition Bulletin, 42(4), 293–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/nbu.12291
48. Zaitseva N. V., Zelenkin S. E., Shur P. Z., Suvorov D. V. (2023). Identification of potential hazards and analysis of critical control points in cultured meat (in vitro meat) production. Voprosy Pitaniia [Problems of Nutrition], 92(6), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.33029/0042-8833-2023-92-6-45-53 (In Russian)
49. Sukhikh, S.A., Ulrikh, E.V., Noskova, S. Yu., Kalashnikova, O.B., Babich, O.O. (2024) Cellular meat cultivation: Scoping review. FOOD METAENGINEERING, 2(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.37442/2024.1.40 (In Russian)
50. Verbeke, W., Sans, P., Van Loo, E. J. (2015). Challenges and prospects for consumer acceptance of cultured meat. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(2), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60884-4
51. Moritz, M. S. M., Verbruggen, S. E. L., Post, M. J. (2015). Alternatives for large-scale production of cultured beef: A review. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(2), 208–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60889-3
52. Onwezen, M. C., Bouwman, E. P., Reinders, M. J., Dagevos H. (2021). A systematic review on consumer acceptance of alternative proteins: Pulses, algae, insects, plant-based meat alternatives, and cultured meat. Appetite, 159, Article 105058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.105058
53. Hartmann, C., Siegrist, M. (2017). Consumer perception and behaviour regarding sustainable protein consumption: A systematic review. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 61, 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2016.12.006
54. Hocquette, A., Lambert, C., Sinquin, C., Peterolff, L., Wagner, Z., Bonny, S. P. F. et al. (2015). Educated consumers don't believe artificial meat is the solution to the problems with the meat industry. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(2), 273–284. http://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60886-8
55. Lähteenmäki-Uutela, A., Rahikainen, M., Lonkila, A., Yang, B. (2021). Alternative proteins and EU food law. Food Control, 130, Article 108336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108336
56. Rozin, P., Vollmecke, T. A. (1986). Food likes and dislikes. Annual Review of Nutrition, 6(1), 433–456. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nu.06.070186.002245
57. Nazzaro, C., Lerro, M., Stanco, M., Marotta, G. (2019). Do consumers like food product innovation? An analysis of willingness to pay for innovative food attributes. British Food Journal, 121(6), 1413–1427. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-06-2018-0389
58. Hamlin, R. P., McNeill, L. S., Sim, J. (2022). Food neophobia, food choice and the details of cultured meat acceptance. Meat Science, 194, Article 108964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2022.108964
59. Verbeke, W., Frewer, L. J., Scholderer, J., De Brabander, H. F. (2007). Why consumers behave as they do with respect to food safety and risk information. Analytica Chimica Acta, 586(1–2), 2–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2006.07.065
60. Bekker, G. A., Fischer, A. R. H., Tobi, H., van Trijp, H. C. M. (2017). Explicit and implicit attitude toward an emerging food technology: The case of cultured meat. Appetite, 108, 245–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.10.002
61. Kadim, I. T., Mahgoub, O., Baqir, S., Faye, B., Purchas, R. (2015). Cultured meat from muscle stem cells: A review of challenges and prospects. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60881-9
62. Zhang, M., Li, L., Bai, J. (2020). Consumer acceptance of cultured meat in urban areas of three cities in China. Food Control, 118, Article 107390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107390
63. Wilks, M., Phillips, C. J. С. (2017). Attitudes to in vitro meat: A survey of potential consumers in the United States. PLoS One, 12(2), Article e0171904. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171904
64. Mancini, M. C., Antonioli, F. (2019). Exploring consumers’ attitude towards cultured meat in Italy. Meat Science, 150, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.12.014
65. Sanchez-Sabate, R., Sabaté, J. (2019) Consumer attitudes towards environmental concerns of meat consumption: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(7), Article 1220. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071220
66. Siddiqui, S. A., Khan, S., Murid, M., Asif, Z., Oboturova, N. P., Nagdalian, A. A. et al. (2022). Marketing strategies for cultured meat: A review. Applied Sciences, 12(17), Article 8795. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178795
67. Tsvakirai, C. Z. (2024). The valency of consumers’ perceptions toward cultured meat: A review. Heliyon, 10, Article e27649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27649
68. Dolgin, E. (2019). Sizzling interest in lab-grown meat belies lack of basic research. Nature, 566(7743), 161–162. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-00373-w
69. Thorrez, L., Vandenburgh, H. (2019). Challenges in the quest for ‘clean meat’. Nature Biotechnology, 37(3), 215–216, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0043-0
70. Klöckner, C. A., Engel, L., Moritz, J., Burton, R. J., Young, J. F., Kidmose, U. et al. (2022). Milk, meat, and fish from the Petri dish — which attributes would make cultured proteins (un)attractive and for whom? Results from a Nordic Survey. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6, Article 847931. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.847931
71. Boler, D. D., Woerner, D. R. (2017). What is meat? A perspective from the American Meat Science Association. Animal Frontiers, 7(4), 8–11. https://doi.org/10.2527/af.2017.0436
72. Hong, T. K., Shin, D.-M., Choi, J., Do, J. T., Han, S. G. (2021). Current issues and technical advances in cultured meat production: A review. Food Science of Animal Resources, 41(3), 355–372. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2021.e14
73. Krings, V. C., Dhont, K., Hodson, G. (2022). Food technology neophobia as a psychological barrier to clean meat acceptance. Food Quality and Preference, 96, Article 104409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104409
74. Takala, T. (2004). The (im)morality of (un)naturalness. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 13(01), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180104131046
75. Tomiyama, A. J., Kawecki, N. S., Rosenfeld, D. L., Jay, J. A., Rajagopal, D., Rowat, A. C. (2020). Bridging the gap between the science of cultured meat and public perceptions. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 104, 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.07.019
76. de Barcellos, M. D., Kügler, J. O., Grunert, K. G., Van Wezemael, L., Péreze-Cueto, F. J. A., Ueland, O. et al. (2010). European consumers' acceptance of beef processing technologies: A focus group study. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, 11(4), 721–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2010.05.003
77. Guerrero, L., Claret, A., Verbeke, W., Enderli, G., Zakowska-Biemans, S., Vanhonacker, F. et al. (2010). Perception of traditional food products in six European regions using free word association. Food Quality and Preference, 21(2), 225–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.06.003
78. Bedanta Roy, Hagappa, A., Ramalingam, Y. D., Mahalingam, N., Shaik, A. B. (2021). A review on lab-grown meat: Advantages and disadvantages. Quest International Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 4(1), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5201528
79. Bhat, Z. F., Fayaz, H. (2011). Prospectus of cultured meat — advancing meat alternatives. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 48(2), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-010-0198-7
80. Edelman, P. D., McFarland, D. C., Mironov, V. A., Matheny, J. G. (2005). Commentary: In vitro-cultured meat production. Tissue Engineering, 11(5–6), 659–662. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2005.11.659
81. Escribano, A. J., Peña, M. B., Díaz-Caro, C., Elghannam, A., Crespo-Cebada, E., Mesías, F. J. (2021). Stated preferences for plant-based and cultured meat: A choice experiment study of Spanish consumers. Sustainability, 13(15), Article 8235. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158235
82. Asioli, D., Fuentes-Pila, J., Alarcón, S., Han, J., Liu, J., Hocquette, J. F. et al. (2022). Consumers’ valuation of cultured beef burger: A multi-Country investigation using choice experiments. Food Policy, 112, Article 102376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102376
83. Rolland, N. C. M., Markus, C. R., Post, M. J. (2020). The effect of information content on acceptance of cultured meat in a tasting context. PLoS One, 15(4), Article e0231176. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231176
84. Piochi, M., Micheloni, M., Torri, L. (2022). Effect of informative claims on the attitude of Italian consumers towards cultured meat and relationship among variables used in an explicit approach. Food Research International, 151, Article 110881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110881
85. Bryant, C. J., Barnett, J. C. (2019). What’s in a name? Consumer perceptions of in vitro meat under different names. Appetite, 137, 104–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.02.021
86. Bryant, C. J., Anderson, J. E., Asher, K. E., Green, C., Gasteratos, K. (2019). Strategies for overcoming aversion to unnaturalness: The case of clean meat. Meat Science, 154(4), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.04.004
87. van der Weele, C., Driessen, C. (2019). How normal meat becomes stranger as cultured meat becomes more normal; Ambivalence and ambiguity below the surface of behavior. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 3, Article 69. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2019.00069
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Gorbunova N.А. Assessment of the consumers’ attitude to the alternative meat. Review. Теория и практика переработки мяса. 2025;10(1):54-66. https://doi.org/10.21323/2414-438X-2025-10-1-54-66
For citation:
Gorbunova N.A. Assessment of the consumers’ attitude to the alternative meat. Review. Theory and practice of meat processing. 2025;10(1):54-66. https://doi.org/10.21323/2414-438X-2025-10-1-54-66
Просмотров:
992
Послать статью по эл. почте 