Biotechnological methods for separation of pigs pancreas glands protein substances with membrane technologies
https://doi.org/10.21323/2414-438X-2024-9-3-236-248
Abstract
The pancreas gland (PG) is a secondary product of livestock processing; it contains a wide range of biologically active compounds. The purpose of this article is to analyze the efficiency of technological approaches for pancreas gland extraction with the help of trehalose and a glycine-proline mixture aimed for recovery and separation of the gland’s protein-peptide compounds. The extraction was conducted with 0.9% NaCl, 0.9% NaCl, with addition of 0.5 M trehalose (0.9% NaCl-0.5 M trehalose) and 0.9% NaCl with addition of 1% glycine and 0.1 M L-proline (0.9% NaCl-1% Gly-0.1M Pro), the ratio of pancreas gland to extractant was equal to 1:5. The concentration of the protein in the supernatants after their extraction was measured by the biuret reaction in a semi-automatic biochemical analyzer Biochem SA. The proteomic composition of the extracts and the native pancreas gland was assessed by one-dimensional Laemmli electrophoresis in a 12.5% polyacrylamide gel and by two-dimensional O’Farrell electrophoresis. When determining the intensity of the protein fractions, it was noted that the methodology of separation of protein-peptide mixtures extracted from the pigs pancreas gland with the extractant 0.9% NaCl-1% Gly-0.1M Pro, ensured the higher extraction of the proteins in comparison with the method of 0.9% NaCl-0.5 M trehalose. Notwithstanding the fact that application of amino acids (glycine and proline) mixture provided for a greater yield of proteins from the extract into the diafiltrate, the experiments in vitro showed that the diafiltrate obtained though trehalose featured higher activity. This may be explained by the fact that after dialysis removal of trehalose from the protein fraction with a molecular weight of less than 50 kDa, its residual quantities were still sufficient to prevent proteins aggregation and, as a consequence, the biological activity of the extracted proteins was preserved, while in the diafiltrate obtained through amino acids mixture where numerous protein aggregates were detected by 2-DE. This study allowed testing the biotechnological methodics on pig pancreatic tissues aimed to intensifying the extraction and separation of protein compounds. The results of the study are important for development of methodological approaches to obtaining the targeted substances for their further utilizing for various purposes.
Keywords
pancreas gland,
electrophoresis,
diafiltration,
ultrafiltration,
dialysis,
trehalose,
glycine,
proline
Supporting agencies: The article was published as part of the research topic No. FGUS-2024-0003 of the state assignment of the V. M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems of RAS.
About the Authors
M. E. Spirina
V. M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Maria E. Spirina, Senior Laboratory Assistant, Experimental Clinic-Laboratory of Biologically Active Substances of Animal Origin
26, Talalikhin str., 109316, Moscow, Russia.
Tel.: +7–495–676–95–11 ext. 207
E. K. Polishchuk
V. M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ekaterina K. Polishchuk, Junior Researcher, Experimental Clinic-Laboratory of Biologically Active Substances of an Animal Origin
26, Talalikhin str., 109316, Moscow, Russia.
Tel.: +7–495–676–95–11 ext. 129
L. V. Fedulova
V. M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Liliya V. Fedulova, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Experimental Clinic-Laboratory of Biologically Active Substances of an Animal Origin
26, Talalikhin str., 109316, Moscow, Russia.
Tel.: +7–495–676–95–11 ext. 128
E. R. Vasilevskaya
V. M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ekaterina R. Vasilevskaya, Candidate of Technical Sciences, Researcher, Experimental Clinic-Laboratory of Biologically Active Substances of an Animal Origin
26, Talalikhin str., 109316, Moscow, Russia.
Tel.: +7–495–676–95–11 ext. 128
References
1. Moszak, M., Szulińska, M., Bogdański, P. (2020). You are what you eat–the relationship between diet, microbiota, and metabolic disorders — a review. Nutrients, 12(4), Article 1096. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12041096
2. Teodoro, A. J. (2019). Bioactive compounds of food: Their role in the prevention and treatment of diseases. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, 2019, Article 3765986. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3765986
3. Karpińska, M., Czauderna, M. (2022). Pancreas gland–its functions, disorders, and physiological impact on the mammals' organism. Frontiers in Physiology, 13, Article 807632. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.807632
4. Silano, V., Barat Baviera, J.M., Bolognesi, C., Cocconcelli, P.S., Crebelli, R., Gott, D.M. et al. (2021). Safety evaluation of a food enzyme containing trypsin, chymotrypsin, elastase and carboxypeptidase from porcine pancreas gland. EFSA Journal, 19(1), Article e06368. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6368
5. Salhi, A., Amara, S., Mansuelle, P., Puppo, R., Lebrun, R., Gontero, B. et al. (2020). Characterization of all the lipolytic activities in pancreatin and comparison with porcine and human pancreatic juices. Biochimie, 169, 106–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2019.07.004
6. Castro-Munoz, R., Garcia-Depraect, O., Leon-Becerril, E., Cassano, A., Conidi, C., Fila, V. (2021). Recovery of proteinbased compounds from meat by-products by membraneassisted separations: A review. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 96(11), 3025–3042. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.6824
7. Miron, S. M., Dutournié, P., Thabet, K., Ponche, A. (2019). Filtration of protein-based solutions with ceramic ultrafiltration membrane. Study of selectivity, adsorption, and protein denaturation. Comptes Rendus. Chimie, 22(2–3), 198–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crci.2018.09.011
8. Arakawa, T., Ejima, D., Akuta, T. (2017). Protein aggregation under high concentration/density state during chromatographic and ultrafiltration processes. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 95, 1153–1158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.11.005
9. Ratnaningsih, E., Reynard, R., Khoiruddin, K., Wenten, I.G., Boopathy, R. (2021). Recent advancements of UF-based separation for selective enrichment of proteins and bioactive peptides — a review. Applied Sciences, 11(3), Article 1078. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11031078
10. Fernandez-Cerezo, L., Rayat, A. C. M. E., Chatel, A., Pollard, J. M., Lye, G. J., Hoare, M. (2020). The prediction of the operating conditions on the permeate flux and on protein aggregation during membrane processing of monoclonal antibodies. Journal of Membrane Science, 596, Article 117606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117606
11. Wang, W., Roberts, C. J. (2018). Protein aggregation — Mechanisms, detection, and control. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 550(1–2), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.08.043
12. Maruf, A., Milewska, M., Varga, M., Wandzik, I. (2023). Trehalose-bearing carriers to target impaired autophagy and protein aggregation diseases. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 66(23), 15613–15628. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c01442
13. Xu, Q., Deng, H., Li, X., Quan, Z.-S. (2021). Application of amino acids in the structural modification of natural products: A review. Frontiers in Chemistry, 9, Article 650569. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2021.650569
14. Liao, Y.-T., Manson, A. C., DeLyser, M. R., Noid, W. G., Cremer, P. S. (2017). Trimethylamine N-oxide stabilizes proteins via a distinct mechanism compared with betaine and glycine. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(10), 2479–2484. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1614609114
15. Dou, M., Lu, C., Sun, Z., Rao, W. (2019). Natural cryoprotectants combinations of l-proline and trehalose for red blood cells cryopreservation. Cryobiology, 91, 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2019.11.002
16. Patriarca, E. J., Cermola, F., D'Aniello, C., Fico, A., Guardiola, O., De Cesare, D. et al. (2021). The multifaceted roles of proline in cell behavior. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 9, Article 728576. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.728576
17. Laemmli, UK (1970). Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature, 227 (5259), 680–685. https://doi.org/10.1038/227680a0
18. Matsumoto, H., Haniu, H., Kurien, B. T., Komori, N. (2019). Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis by glass tube-based IEF and SDS-PAGE. Chapter in a book: Electrophoretic Separation of Proteins (Vol. 1855). Humana Press, New York, NY, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8793-1_11
19. Ahremko, A. G. (2019). Application of two-dimensional electrophoresis method for assessing meat products composition on model stuffing example. Vsyo o Myase, 3, 46–48. https://doi.org/10.21323/2071-2499-2019-3-46-48 (In Russian)
20. Blum, H., Beier, H., Gross, H. J. (1987). Improved silver staining of plant proteins, RNA and DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Electrophoresis, 8(2), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.1150080203
21. Vinciguerra, D., Gelb, M. B., Maynard, H. D. (2022). Synthesis and application of trehalose materials. JACS Au, 2(7), 1561–1587. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.2c00309
22. Kadoya, S., Fujii, K., Izutsu, K., Yonemochi, E., Terada, K., Yomota, C. et al. (2010). Freeze-drying of proteins with glassforming oligosaccharide-derived sugar alcohols. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 389(1–2), 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.01.027
23. Samuel, D., Ganesh, G., Yang, P.-W., Chang, M.-M., Wang, S.-L., Hwang, K.-C. et al. (2008). Proline inhibits aggregation during protein refolding. Protein Science, 9(2), 344–352. https://doi.org/10.1110/ps.9.2.344
24. P00591 LIPP_PIG (Pancreatic triacylglycerol lipase). UniProt. Retrieved from https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/P00591/entry#sequences Accessed August 21, 2023
25. D7EZN2 LIPR2_PIG (Pancreatic lipase-related protein 2). UniProt. Retrieved from https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/D7EZN2/entry#sequences Accessed August 21, 2023
26. van den Berg, B., Tessari, M., Boelens, R., Dijkman, R., Kaptein, R., de Haas, G. H. et al. (1995). Solution structure of porcine pancreatic phospholipase A2 complexed with micelles and a competitive inhibitor. Journal of Biomolecular NMR, 5(2), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00208802
27. Ardelt, W. (1974). Partial purification and properties of porcine pancreatic elastase II. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) — Enzymology, 341(2), 318–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2744(74)90224-1
28. P00772 · CELA1_PIG (Chymotrypsin-like elastase family member 1). UniProt. Retrieved from https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/P00772/entry Accessed August 21, 2023.
29. P00761 · TRYP_PIG (Trypsin). UniProt. Retrieved from https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/P00761/entry#function Accessed August 21, 2023
30. P63298 SECR_PIG (Secretin). UniProt. Retrieved from https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/P63298/entry Accessed July 30, 2024
31. P01351 GAST_PIG (Gastrin). UniProt. Retrieved from https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/P01351/entry Accessed July 10, 2024
32. P01315 INS_PIG (Insulin). UniProt. Retrieved from https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/P01315/entry Accessed July 30, 2024
33. P02703 · COL_PIG (Colipase). UniProt. Retrieved from https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/P02703/entry Accessed July 28, 2024
34. Brockman, H. L. (1981). Triglyceride lipase from porcine pancreas gland. Chapter in a book: Methods in enzymology (Vol. 71). Academic Press, 1981. https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(81)71074-7
35. Neugebauer, E. A. (2019). Handbook of Mediators in Septic Shock. CRC Press, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351071123
36. Lambré, C., Barat Baviera, J.M., Bolognesi, C., Cocconcelli, P.S., Crebelli, R., Gott, D.M. et al. (2022). Safety evaluation of the food enzyme containing trypsin, chymotrypsin, α -amylase and triacylglycerol lipase from porcine pancreas gland. EFSA Journal, 20(4), Artisle e07239. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7239
37. Berg, P., Svendsen, S. L., Ayasse, N., Sorensen, M. V., Leipziger, J. (2024). Secretin: A hormone for HCO3– homeostasis. Pflugers Archiv — European Journal of Physiology, 476(4), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-024-02906-3
38. Ma, Z., Zhang, Y., Su, J., Li, X., Yang, S., Qiao, W. et al. (2018). Distribution of the pig gastrin-releasing peptide receptor and the effect of GRP on porcine Leydig cells. Peptides, 99, 142– 152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2017.09.015
39. Rahman, M. S., Hossain, K. S., Das, S., Kundu, S., Adegoke, E. O., Rahman, Md. A. et al. (2021). Role of insulin in health and disease: An update. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(12), Article 6403. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22126403
40. Lim, S. Y., Steiner, J. M., Cridge, H. (2022). Lipases: It's not just pancreatic lipase! American Journal of Veterinary Research, 83(8), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.22.03.0048
41. Szczesna, K. (2019). Why does the molecular weight of my protein differ from the theoretically expected weight? Technology Networks — Proteomics and Metabolomics. Retrieved from https://www.technologynetworks.com/proteomics/articles/why-does-the-molecular-weightof-my-protein-differ-from-the-theoretically-expectedweight-322079 Accessed July 30, 2024
42. Zhu, K., Zhao, J., Lubman, D. M., Miller, F. R., Barder, T. J. (2005). Protein p I shifts due to posttranslational modifications in the separation and characterization of proteins. Analytical Chemistry, 77(9), 2745–2755. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac048494w
43. P19619 ANXA1_PIG (Annexin A1). UniProt. Retrieved from https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/P19619/entry#sequences Accessed August 21, 2023
44. Sun, L., Qin, T., Liu, Y., Zhao, H., Xia, X., Lei, X. (2018). Cloning, expression, and characterization of a porcine pancreatic α -amylase in Pichia pastoris. Animal Nutrition, 4(2), 234– 240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2017.11.004
45. P08132 ANXA4_PIG (Annexin A4). UniProt. Retrieved from https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/P08132/entry Accessed July 30, 2024
46. P19620 ANXA2_PIG (Annexin A2). UniProt. Retrieved from https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/P19620/entry Accessed August 6, 2024
47. A1E295 CATB_PIG (Cathepsin B). UniProt. Retrieved from https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/A1E295/entry Accessed August 8, 2024
48. P00795 CATD_PIG (Cathepsin D). UniProt. Retrieved from https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/P00795/entry Accessed August 8, 2024
49. Q28944 CATL1_PIG (Procathepsin L). UniProt. Retrieved from https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/Q28944/entry Accessed August 8, 2024
50. O46427 · CATH_PIG (Pro-cathepsin H). UniProt. Retrieved from https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/O46427/entry Accessed August 8, 2024
51. Blanchard, P. J., Mantle, D. (1996). Comparison of proteolytic enzyme levels in chicken, pig, lamb and rabbit muscle at point of slaughter: Role in meat tenderization post mortem. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 71(1), 83– 91. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097–0010(199605)71:1<83::AID-JSFA552>3.0.CO;2-F
52. Peerapen, P., Boonmark, W., Thongboonkerd, V. (2023). Characterizations of annexin A1-interacting proteins in apical membrane and cytosolic compartments of renal tubular epithelial cells. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 21, 3796–3809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2023.07.037
53. G1ARD6 G1ARD6_PIG (Chymotrypsin C). UniProt. Retrieved from https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/G1ARD6/entry Accessed August 21, 2023
54. A0A480M2A7 A0A480M2A7_PIG (Chymotrypsinogen B2). UniProt. Retrieved from https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/A0A480M2A7/entry Accessed August 21, 2023
55. A0A480INX1 A0A480INX1_PIG (Chymotrypsinogen B2). UniProt. Retrieved from https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/A0A480INX1/entry Accessed August 21, 2023
56. Elastase, porcine pancreas gland, high purity, crystallized. MERCK. Retrieved from https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/RU/en/product/mm/324682 Accessed August 21, 2023
57. Hudáky, P., Kaslik, G., Venekei, I., Gráf, L. (2001). The differential specificity of chymotrypsin A and B is determined by amino acid 226. European Journal of Biochemistry, 259(1–2), 528–533. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-1327.1999.00075.x
58. A0A4X1V2S2 · A0A4X1V2S2_PIG (Trypsinogen). UniProt. Retrieved from https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/A0A4X1V2S2/entry Accessed August 21, 2023
59. A0A8D1RDS5 A0A8D1RDS5_PIG (Trypsinogen). UniProt. Retrieved from https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/A0A8D1RDS5/entry Accessed August 8, 2024
60. P01274 GLUC_PIG (Pro-glucagon). UniProt. Retrieved from https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/P01274/entry Accessed August 2, 2023
61. P01359 TFF2_PIG (Trefoil factor 2). UniProt. Retrieved from https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/P01359/entry Accessed August 3, 2023
62. P01356 CCKN_PIG (Cholecystokinin). UniProt. Retrieved from https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/P01356/entry Accessed August 8, 2024
63. P00592 PA21B_PIG (Phospholipase A2, major isoenzyme). UniProt. Retrieved from https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/P00592/entry Accessed August 8, 2024
64. A0A8D2CC29 · A0A8D2CC29_PIG (Triacylglycerol lipase). UniProt. Retrieved from https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/A0A8D2CC29/entry Accessed August 8, 2024
65. A0A8D1Y1K2 · A0A8D1Y1K2_PIG (chymotrypsin). UniProt. Retrieved from https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/A0A-8D1Y1K2/entry Accessed August 8, 2024
66. Milojević, M., Rožanc, J., Vajda, J., Činč Ćurić, L., Paradiž, E., Stožer, A. et al. (2021). In vitro disease models of the endocrine pancreas gland. Biomedicines, 9(10), Article 1415. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9101415
Review
For citations:
Spirina M.E., Polishchuk E.K., Fedulova L.V., Vasilevskaya E.R. Biotechnological methods for separation of pigs pancreas glands protein substances with membrane technologies. Theory and practice of meat processing. 2024;9(3):236-248. https://doi.org/10.21323/2414-438X-2024-9-3-236-248
Views:
719
Email this article 